Should Nonprofits and Churches Endorse Political Candidates? A Risky Proposition
A recent IRS filing has opened the door for churches and other religious nonprofits to endorse political candidates without risking their tax-exempt status. As reported by The Chronicle of Philanthropy in its July 2025 article, “IRS Opens Door for Churches to Endorse Political Candidates,” the move stems from a legal case involving two Texas churches and the National Religious Broadcasters. The IRS's new interpretation of the Johnson Amendment—longstanding legislation prohibiting political activity by 501(c)(3) organizations—reframes such endorsements as permissible when delivered as internal, religious speech.
While the legal precedent may be shifting, the strategic wisdom of such endorsements remains highly debatable. For mission-driven organizations, including faith-based institutions, taking sides politically is rarely a neutral act. Churches and nonprofits are, by their very nature, made up of people with diverse perspectives, life experiences, and beliefs. To assume political consensus within a community is both naïve and potentially damaging.
The primary risk? Alienation.
Nonprofits—religious or otherwise—thrive on the trust and engagement of their supporters. That trust is built on shared values, a commitment to service, and a focus on mission. Introducing partisan endorsements into that ecosystem can fracture communities, create division within congregations, and discourage participation from those who feel misaligned or marginalized by the organization’s political stance.
From a financial perspective, the danger is just as real. Most nonprofits depend on voluntary contributions. If a donor feels that their gift is indirectly supporting a candidate or party they oppose, they may reduce—or entirely withdraw—their support. This can be especially problematic for churches, where giving is deeply tied to trust, values, and emotional connection to the institution. A misstep in this area can turn a loyal donor into a silent exit.
Moreover, the perception of neutrality has long helped nonprofit organizations retain broad credibility. That credibility is essential when seeking support across community, corporate, and even interfaith or bipartisan lines. Once a group is perceived as politically aligned, it risks losing the very neutrality that enables it to serve as a trusted voice in civic or spiritual life.
While the IRS may have shifted its stance, nonprofit leaders must weigh legal permission against practical prudence. Just because you can endorse candidates doesn’t mean you should. Mission, inclusivity, and long-term sustainability should guide decision-making—not momentary political alignment.
As the nonprofit sector continues to navigate a polarized cultural landscape, the organizations that maintain focus on shared values and community impact—rather than political endorsement—will likely emerge more unified and resilient.
